Oil and the 'fiscal cliff'

Tverberg explores the connection between changes in the oil market and growing concern of the 'fiscal cliff.'?

By Gail Tverberg,?Guest blogger / December 1, 2012

A mixture of oil, diesel fuel, water and mud sprays as roughnecks wrestle pipe on a True Company oil drilling rig outside Watford, N.D., in this October 2012 file photo. If oil production remains relatively flat, Tverberg writes, additional tax increases will likely be needed later, as higher oil prices lead to more layoffs, and more need for government spending.

Jim Urquhart/Reuters/File

Enlarge

The United States? fiscal cliff is very much related to several changes we have been going through recently, and will likely continue to experience:

Skip to next paragraph Our Finite World

Gail Tverberg, an actuary with a background in math, analyzes energy and financial matters from a perspective that the world has limited resources. For more of Gail's posts, click?here.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

1. High oil prices (more than triple their level ten years ago). High oil prices cause people to cut back on discretionary spending, leading to layoffs in discretionary industries and debt defaults. Governments get less revenue in taxes at the same time they need to increase spending for unemployment benefits, bailing out banks, and stimulus funds. Result: financial problems for governments of oil importing countries, including many Eurozone countries and the United States.
2. More free trade with Asian countries starting about 2001, when?China joined the World Trade Organization. This change sent many jobs to Asia, and also holds down wages in US industries that compete with companies using overseas labor.
3. Lots of baby boomers becoming eligible for Medicare and Social Security, starting about 2011.?This is a problem because taxes, in practice, need to cover the cost of ?benefits on a cash flow basis, which is the way US handles its financial accounting. As a practical matter, this is the way the world economy works as well?the goods and services used today are created by today?s workers, with resources pulled out of the ground today. Carryovers in terms of goods are very limited?mostly a little grain.
4. A health care industry that is able to charge fees that are increasingly out of line with the wages of common workers.

None of these issues looks likely to improve in the near future, suggesting that we are encountering a long-term problem that is only likely to get worse.

In this post, I provide charts showing that if the US funding problem is fixed through higher taxes on individuals (including proprietors), the needed fix would require additional taxes averaging approximately 15% of each person?s wages. If oil production remains relatively flat, as it has since 2005, additional tax increases even above this level will likely be needed later, as higher oil prices lead to more layoffs, and more need for government spending.?

I also discuss three approaches other than higher taxes on individuals that might be used to try to fix the problem:

1. Send programs back to the states
2. Fix health care costs by emulating the Japanese using severe caps on medical charges
3. Rethink taxes on imports

The first approach is being considered by others. I see drawbacks to it that others may have overlooked. The second two approaches are admittedly nonstandard, but need to be at least considered.

I am not very optimistic that a way can be found around the fiscal cliff. The problems are too much ?baked into the cake?. But if we don?t understand what the magnitude of the problem is, and what is causing it, it is hard to make good decisions.

The Magnitude of the Problem

The ?standard? way of looking at government income and expense is as a percentage of GDP. As a practical matter, though, about 80% of federal taxes relate to individuals, so it makes more sense to me to use a wage base for comparison, especially if there is concern that wages aren?t keeping up with GDP.

1?|?2?|?3?|?4?|?5

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/BfgQpPxFsUQ/Oil-and-the-fiscal-cliff

southern miss rod blagojevich rod blagojevich uconn ncaa march madness mario williams vcu